Darknet markets compared
Nine darknet markets, laid out as facts. No scores, no ranking, no claim that one is better than another. Each row states what is verifiable: when the market opened, which coins it accepts, where it serves and in what language, and how many mirror addresses it runs at once. Compare darknet markets on those columns and the choice narrows to what a constraint actually needs.
The table
| Market | Founded | Coins | Language and region | Mirrors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexus Market | 2023 | BTC, LTC, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| Anubis Market | 2024 | BTC, LTC, ETH, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| TorZon Market | 2022 | BTC, XMR | Global, English | 5 |
| Awazon | 2024 | BTC, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| WeTheNorth (WTN) | 2021 | BTC, XMR | Canada, EN and FR | 3 |
| Osiris Market | 2024 | BTC, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| Crown Market | 2024 | BTC, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| Mars Market | 2023 | BTC, LTC, XMR | Global, English | 3 |
| BlackOps Market | 2024 | XMR | Global, English | 3 |
How to read the columns
Founded is the year the market opened, taken from the market's own stated figure. A founding year is a claim the market makes, not a date that can be checked against a record. It is still useful, because it orders the list by how long each market has been running, and a market that has been open longer has had more time to either keep going or not.
Coins is what the market accepts as payment. Monero, XMR, is the private coin, and it is the one that does not put the amount of a purchase on a public ledger. Bitcoin, BTC, is the most widely used and the one every market takes. Litecoin, LTC, is the low fee option, a smaller coin with a cheaper transfer. Ethereum, ETH, is the one that only Anubis accepts, and it is the column that makes that market the only one in the list for an ETH balance.
Mirrors is how many onion addresses the market runs at the same time. Every address opens the same market, so the number is not a rank. It is a count of entry points. More mirrors means more chances that at least one address opens when the others do not, because a market that has more addresses has more paths to take when one of them is blocked or slow.
What "founded" actually tells you
The year a market opened is not a grade. A market that started in 2021 is not better than one that started in 2024, and a market that started in 2024 is not a risk just because it is new. Age by itself is a number, not a verdict. An old market survived the years by staying open, which says something about the people running it. A new market may have started with a cleaner setup, fewer habits carried over from earlier versions, and a team that has not yet grown the kind of internal complexity that slows decisions. Neither fact is a guarantee. Both are facts.
What age does give is history. A market that has been open for several years has rotated its address more than once, and each rotation is a moment where the market proved it could move and still be found. It has had time to build a set of PGP keys that buyers have checked, to establish a forum presence that predates the current address, and to accumulate a track record of how it handled disputes, outages, and vendor problems. A market that opened last year has less of that. Fewer rotations to point to, fewer keys that a community has already verified, fewer seasons of disputes to review.
What age does not give is a prediction. A market that has been open for five years can close next month. A market that opened last year can be running in five years. The founding year orders the list by time, and time is one input into a judgment, not the judgment. Read the year, note what it implies about history, and then let the other columns and the checks on the verify page do the rest of the work.
Choosing by a constraint, not by a ranking
The table does not name a best darknet market, because the right market is the one that fits a specific condition, and the condition is different for every buyer. Pick the constraint and the table answers.
Need to pay with ETH? Anubis is the only one in the list that takes it. Need to pay with XMR and nothing else? BlackOps is the only one that accepts XMR alone. Need to buy from Canada, or in French? WeTheNorth serves Canada and runs in English and French. Need the most mirrors so that an address is most likely to open? TorZon runs five. Need the market that has been open the longest? WeTheNorth started in 2021, and TorZon is next at 2022.
Need a low profile on the payment itself, where the amount of the purchase does not land on a public ledger? Every market in the list takes XMR, and XMR is the coin that keeps the transaction off the chain. If the constraint is that the payment should not be readable by anyone who looks at a blockchain, the coin column narrows the choice to any market that lists XMR, and the decision then comes down to the other columns, region, language, mirrors, and the checks on the verify page.
Need to make a small purchase where a fee would eat a visible share of the order? Litecoin is the low fee option in the list, and it appears on Nexus Market, Anubis Market, and Mars Market. A small order in BTC can carry a fee that is a meaningful percentage of the total. The same order in LTC moves for less, and the three markets that take it are the ones where that constraint is met. If the purchase is small and the fee is the thing that matters, those three rows are the relevant ones.
Each of those answers comes from a column, not from a judgment. The table says which market fits which condition. It does not say which market is better, and it should not, because better depends on the condition and the condition is the buyer's.
What the table does not show
Stock, prices, and delivery speed change inside a market, and they change often. A column here says a market takes XMR and runs three mirrors. It does not say what the market has for sale, at what price, or how fast a vendor ships. The table is about access: how to get in, what to pay with, and where the market serves. The goods are a separate question, and the market's own pages are where they get answered.
Three things are only visible from the inside. Assortment and prices shift daily. A market can list a category today and have no vendor in it next week. A price that looks fair in one market can be higher in another for the same item, and the difference is not a ranking, it is just the state of the vendor pool at that moment. Vendor speed varies by vendor, not by market. A market with a strong vendor in one category and a slow one in another will feel fast in the first and slow in the second, and no column in a table captures that. Support quality is the hardest to judge from outside. A dispute handled well and one handled badly both look the same in a table, and the difference only shows up when a buyer needs it.
Each market in the list has its own page with the address, the coin list, and notes specific to that market. The pages for Nexus Market, TorZon Market, and WeTheNorth are examples of that format, and the other six follow the same structure. Open the page for the market the constraint points to, verify the address, and then go inside. The table gets you to the door. The rest happens past it.